How many, before it becomes wrong? (part 1 of 2)

How many Doctors, scientists, epidemiologists, virologists, biologists, and even veterinarians have to cry out against the global vaccine program before their number is big enough that people will stop and question its legitimacy?

What number is big enough? 100,000? A million? 10 million? Is 50 million enough? Surely 2 has not been enough, nor 10, nor 100. Nor one thousand. I would guess there are at least 10,000 doctors on the planet are opposed to what is happening in our society right now.

How many do we need in order to halt the vaccine rollout?

What is that number?

From how we have been lving for the past 6 months, it may very well seem that nothing can stop the planetary rollout of the mRNA vaccines. No amount of medical professionals will be able to stop it.

More importantly, how many people will our health officers allow to die from the vaccine, or vaccine related injury, before it’s a problem? The US FDA pulled the H1N1 flu vaccine after 25 deaths. With the mRNA vaccines, this number is much larger, and the train has left the station. These true numbers will come out. It won’t just be 25 people.

I’ll repeat the question. How many dead from vaccine related injury are acceptable? 

How about 100,000? Is 100k vaccine deaths okay?

Was one?

How many children’s deaths are okay, until the death toll becomes too high, and it becomes unacceptable? Should we have that number in mind, would you think, before the mandates for childhood mRNA vaccination come out? Should we have that number in mind while the 6-month to 12 year trials are currently underway? Or should we just decide later, if we start feeling guilty?

The below screenshot was taken at the time of writing, from

It was argued to me that this number of 0.0019% was acceptable given the number of people vaccinated, and given the alternative of dying from COVID-19. I want to focus on this next statement from the above CDC web page:

Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare“.

Comparatively speaking, that number of 0.0019% actually resembles the statistical percentage chance that I have of actually dying from COVID-19.

Six thousand three hundred and forty human beings, dying within a close enough time frame that it made someone believe that the vaccine was a potential contributing factor.

I was provided the argument that the practitioner who delivered the injection couldn’t possibly have known all the side effects or what could be expected to be the outcome of administering this drug. So therefore they shouldn’t be held accountable. Just like a doctor can’t possibly know all the side effects of existing approved drugs they prescribe to patients.

So then I ask, is there any difference between an approved drug and a trial anymore? Why even bother going through approval and regulatory safety testing and compliance measures if the doctors cannot possibly know the effects anyway?

We know that pharmaceutical companies cannot legally be held liable for adverse effects related to their products. Our elected officials conceded this on our behalf. Those that create the vaccines that we are clearly being coerced to get in many cases, can not be made responsible for the outcome.

Buyer beware. It’s your choice. The responsibility is all on you, we wash our hands of it. We produce it, we pass your tests, and we sell it to you, but we never guarantee that it works, and we won’t stake our reputation or our livelihood on it, especially when it comes to a drug that you inject directly into your body.

Sounds like a great deal. Sign me up. I’ll take 10 injections per citizen please, and let’s make sure we get extras for the next 10 years just in case it wears off and stops working and we need re-charge.

By comparison, firearm and munitions manufacturers cannot be held liable for the outcomes of their products. Why is that? The reason is because if you are a victim of a gunshot wound, the shooter is not allowed to claim that he did not know that the bullet would cause harm to the victim. This is common sense, based on hundreds of years of reality based evidence proving that a high velocity puncture wound by a foreign metal object can easily be fatal to humans. This is also true if you are assaulted with a blunt weapon or sharp weapon. We have thousands of years of proof of that on our bloody history.

What is also true, that we have thousands of years of provable evidence for, is poison. If you are the victim of poisoning, in some cases the assailant can knowingly poison you, most likely with subterfuge or covert means to get you to eat or drink something harmful without you knowing. Presumably this could also happen by accident.

This is the arena we are playing in today. Common sense would dictate that the reason we do safety tests on pharmaceutical drugs is so that we can make sure that the drug is safe for administering into our bodies. We have thousands of years of evidence that some plants are healthy to consume and others are deadly. That some animals can bite or claw you and you can recover with proper medical treatment, while others can bite you and inject a toxin that can seriously harm or kill you if untreated.

The matter of injectable drugs is somewhat different. A medical practitioner is allowed to inject you with a drug, with the informed consent of the recipient who accepts the risk of all published and known side effects produced via testing, and the mutual understanding and agreement that the foreign substance is meant to aid the biological function of the recipient. Any form of coercion or pressure from the medical practitioner is in violation of the Nuremberg Code. The matter of whether or not a 12 year old has the mental capacity to provide informed consent has yet to be debated publicly, however we know that the health authorities have summarily decreed this to be the case. The claim on behlaf of the medical practitioner that “I was just following orders”, is insufficient in the event that all side effects of administering the drug are unknown.

The reason why the safety and compliance testing is so stringent and takes many years is for this reason, in order to protect the medical practitioner by producing all known side effects of the drug, prior to the practitioner administering it, so that both parties have a clear understanding of all risks.

If for example the drug has a side effect of death to a certain percentage of the population due to a pre-existing condition, this must be known prior to the drug being approved, so that the practitioner can know in advance that the drug is harmful and therefore avoid administering it to the patient, and thereby avoid causing harm to the patient, in violation of their Hippocratic Oath, and protect the patient from medical malfeasance.

Here is the similar results in Canada (

12,006 reports of adverse events in Canada. 3,063 considered serious.

According to this, 3063 humans are seriously injured or dead from injury related to this vaccine, and this is an acceptable risk. This is similar to the amount of people that died in the destruction of the World Trade Center towers in New York City on September 11, 2001, the 20-years anniversary of which is arriving next month.

“The benefits of vaccines authorized in Canada continue to outweigh the risks.”

Who will be the one to explain to the 3063 people or their families, that their serious side effect that they may or may not be dealing with for the remainder of their lives, was not-preventable, because it was completely un-knowable?

This risk is acceptable, according to Health Canada.

What in the actual fuck. What has happened to our humanity?

Health Canada? Provincial Health? I thought you people were doctors. I thought you all took oaths to do no harm.

Oh that’s right, I forgot. THIS form of harm is acceptable, nigh even beneficial.

“The benefits continue to outweigh the risks” because we are in an emergency right now. It’s a global pandemic. Billions have died already.

Sorry? Oh you mean not billions? There is 7 billion people on earth. I thought you said this was a pandemic. Not an epidemic. Not even 1 billion?

Okay hundreds of millions have died already from this pandemic then.



Okay millions have died already, during the last year of 2020, in Canada alone, while we have not had a vaccine and have been dealing with a completely novel and never-before seen virus with no known medical treatment.

Hmm. okay what actually is this figure.

In 2018 and 2019 Canada had 284k mortality rate seen below (

I then downloaded a dataset (CSV) that showed all causes of death, by week, since Jan 1, 2018 to Dec 31, 2020:

EDIT (Aug 19, 2021): I was able to get all the codes A00 – Y89. The default on the above page is for ‘selected’ codes, but you can ‘Add/Remove Data’ and customize and configure it to pull all the data. The dataset I pulled is a csv you can download (here).

This is the breakdown of total deaths, influenza and COVID-19;

YearInfluenza and Pnemonia [J09-J18]COVID-19Total (All causes)

The thing that stands out from the figures above in my mind, is that from a statistical perspective, 13,910 people died from COVID-19 in Canada in the year 2020. There was another number that was “COVID-19, virus not identified [U07.2]” which was 1385 Canadians. Since the virus was not identified, not sure how they attribute that to COVID.

We speculate the 13,910 number is weighted heavily in the 75+ age group as well. Upon further inspection, we see that only half of our 12 provinces and territories contributed to the majority of this COVID-19 fatality figure (I talk about this further down, see the green colored rows in the screenshot below).

The biggest problem I have is that in the first 7 months of 2021, we have 12006 reports of adverse events related to the vaccines, which approaches the total death count of 13910 from the year 2020. Malignant neoplasms (cancers), was the most common cause of death in 2020, followed by heart disease, then COVID-19.

Canadian causes of death, have codes A00 through to Y89 according to the Statistics Canada data below. in 2020, all causes of death was 306,320 Canadians. COVID-19 was responsible for 13,910 deaths. That is 4.5% of the death that year, but in the year 2020, the population of Canad for agen 20 and over was 29,865,726. That means that of the total population of adults in canada, the COVID death rate was 13,910 / 29,865,726 = 0.000465 %..

Prior to 2020, the number of deaths required in order to constitute an actual pandemic was 3-5% of the total population. Therefore in order for this illness to consitute an actual pandemic, it would mean that 4 out of ever 100 Canadians would be dead. Mathematically that would mean 4% of 29.865 Million which is 1,194,629 people.

1,194,629 (actual pandemic) compared to 13,910, or 15295 if you include ‘unidentified COVID-19’ whatever that means.

The full list of all causes of death in 2020. Cancer (malignant neoplasms) followed by all others, combined, followed by heart disease, accidents, then COVID-19. In terms of dangers worthy fo the complete halt of all society for 18 months, I think as a country, we are somewhat confused.

Let us keep in mind that vaccines had nothing to do with these numbers. Vaccine rollout did not start until December 2020.

Upon further inspection, as I mentioned above, we see that only half of Canada’s 12 provinces and territories were real contributors to the spread of COVID-19 as well. The Atlantic provinces, Prairies and Northern Territories mostly missed the pandemic completely in 2020.

Prior to the rollout of the vaccine, only 15,295 Canadians died from COVID-19 (or suspected of), mostly in the 5 most populated provinces. To date we have produced 12006 adverse events from the vaccine. Based on the known side effects discussed below, I fear this number may outgrow the number of actual 2020 deaths from COVID-19.

It was argued to me that these mRNA drugs have been fully approved for use in Canada and that all proper trials and proper human testing was done prior to the mass vaccination campaign that we have been living since December 2020.

Canada has a list of “Drug and vaccine authorizations for COVID-19: List of authorized drugs, vaccines and expanded indications” (

Canada’s Minister Of Health is authorized by the Food and Drug Act of Canada to issue a 14-day Interim Order for the purpose of countering emergency health events should they arise. By definition, an Interim Order would normally expire 14 days later, but in accordance with Canadian law, it can be extended for up to one year if the Governor General of Canada (the representative of the queen of England in Canada) issues it as an ‘Order in Council’.

“Without an Order in Council approving it, the Interim Order would, in accordance with paragraph 30.1(2)(a) of the Act, cease to have effect 14 days after it was made. An Order in Council would enable the operation of the Interim Order, allowing it to remain in effect for up to one year after it is made.”

In terms of approval and authorization, we know that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorizes the vaccines under its emergency use authorization. The US and Canadian time line looks like this:

🇺🇸 February 4, 2020 – The US FDA issued a Determination of Public Health Emergency

🇺🇸 March 2, 2020 – This is followed by US FDA issuing an Emergency Use Declaration.

🇺🇸 March 20, 2020 – The US FDA issues their Emergency Use Authorization Declaration.

🇨🇦 May 23, 2020 – Canada’s Minister of Health Patricia Hajdu signed an “Interim Order respecting clinical trials for medical devices and drugs relating to COVID-19” (link here). Four days later, a follow-up NOTICE was released (link here). It stated as of May 27, 2020 that there were no known effective treatments for COVID-19:

🇨🇦 September 16, 2020 – Canada’s Minister of Health issued the “Interim Order Respecting the Importation, Sale and Advertising of Drugs for Use in Relation to COVID-19” (link here).

🇨🇦 Sept 25, 2020 – The Order In Council (here) was issued by the Governor General (Queen) Of Canada empowering this order to remain in effect until Sept 25, 2021. An Explanatory Note was also issued (link here).

This interim order, which was created by the Minister of Health, grants the Minister of Health the power and discretion to determine if a drug is safe for use in Canada by declaring that the drug’s benefits outweigh its risks. This order allows the applicant (company who would be importing/selling the drug) to submit the known (at the time of application) information with respect to the safety and effectiveness of a COVID-19 drug, and then subsequently embark on a process of a rolling application approach whereby the applicant (should) file further information throughout the course of the review as it becomes available, providing that the applicant submits a plan outlining how and when they will provide the Minister with the required information or data that is outstanding.

See below this excerpt from this interim order:

🇺🇸 October 22, 2020 – The US FDA held an online public meeting and presentation discussing the vaccines, wherein, the slide of known possible side effects was displayed for a split second, at 2:33:40 into the presentation. The YouTube link for this 8 hour presentation is here –

The below was considered a ‘working list’ and therefore subject to change:

  • Guillain-Barré syndrome
  • Acute disseminated encephaloymelitis (“Characterized by a brief but widespread attack of inflammation in the brain and spinal cord that damages myelin – the protective covering of nerve fibers,” according to NIH.)
  • Transverse myelitis
  • Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/meningoencephalitis/meningitis/encepholaphathy
  • Convulsions/seizures
  • Stroke
  • Narcolepsy and cataplexy
  • Anaphlyaxis
  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Myocarditis/pericarditis
  • Autoimmune disease
  • Deaths
  • Pregnancy and birth outcomes
  • Other acute demyelinating diseases
  • Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Disseminated intravascular coagulation
  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
  • Kawasaki disease
  • Vaccine enhanced disease

🇨🇦 November 26, 2020 – The complete mortality statistics are released by Statistics Canada for the year 2019. In the year of 2019 in Canada, there were 6893 deaths by Influenza related categories (J09 – J18), and it was the 7th leading cause of death in 2019.

Statistics Canada also releases weekly counts for the current year, in ˆselect’ categories. I do find it unusual that the 7th highest ranked cause of death in Canada does not appear in the weekly statistics released by Stats Canada. This again is the spreadsheet that I have grouping the data from the CSV (raw data) file downloaded from stats Canada. They do not publish J09 – J18 (Influenza) for 2020, at least not when I downloaded this data which was at the end of July, 2021:

I emailed Stats Canada to find out when they would be releasing the complete mortality totals for the year 2020, and the response that I got was that it would be released this November, 2021, consistent with last years totals. So we will have to wait 3 more months from this article posting in order to compare Influenza with COVID-19 mortality rates in Canada.

🇺🇸 🇨🇦 December 2020 – Vaccine rollouts simultaneously begin across what is essentially the entire planet.

Having grown up in Canada my whole life, I would not describe our parliamentary government as being able to do anything quickly. This past 18 months however, many, many edicts have gone out from Ottawa in the form of Orders In Council. Specifically regarding quarantining and all COVID measures. No debate, simply orders based on what a critical thinker can only describe as manufactured urgency.

End of Part 1.

Prior to releasing part 2, I will leave this little nugget.

Reiner Fuellmich and his team along with Dr. Bryan Ardis discuss this in great detail in this 59min video that I do implore that you watch with an open mind.

The decisions being made with regard to the pandemic affect billions of people, and carry billions of dollars with them, if not trillions. Those that make decisions affecting this type of consequences you must realize, are people that do not leave matters up to chance or luck.

The very fact that our government was so ably prepared to enact emergency measures this precise on such short notice in lock step with the rest of the planet I conclude is at the least suspect, and a strong enough deviation from standard beaurocratic behavior that at least bears investigation, auditing and oversight.

In part 2 I will get into the ethics and personal takeaways from the perspective of the persecuted, unvaccinated, “unhuman”.

Much Love 🙏


(click here for part 2)